×
Get latest travel news
The U.S. travel sector is facing significant anxiety as Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin has threatened to withdraw Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Officers from airports located in sanctuary cities. This potential action, aimed at responding to local governments that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, could have dire consequences for both tourism and flight operations, leading airlines, airports, and travel organizations to issue urgent warnings.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBP Officers play a crucial role in managing international travel into the United States. They oversee customs and immigration checks, facilitate cargo clearance, and ensure compliance with relevant security protocols. Major airports in cities like New York’s JFK, San Francisco International (SFO), Chicago’s O’Hare, and Los Angeles International (LAX) handle millions of international travelers each year. For instance, JFK welcomed over 35 million international passengers in 2025, while SFO recorded approximately 22 million.
Given these statistics, the consistent presence of CBP Officers is essential. Any disruption in staffing can quickly result in flight delays, extended wait times, and missed connections. Airlines are emphasizing that these officers are key to maintaining operational schedules and supporting the broader tourism economy.
Sanctuary cities enact policies that restrict collaboration with federal immigration authorities, often choosing not to honor detainer requests or participate in deportation procedures. While such measures aim to protect community residents, they have inadvertently put local airports in a precarious political position. Mullin’s threat to withdraw CBP Officers appears to be a tactic to assert federal authority over jurisdictions that resist cooperation.
Local government and airport authority officials have strongly disagreed with Mullin’s stance. For example, SFO has warned that the removal of CBP Officers would “jeopardize the safety and efficiency of international travel.” New York officials have cautioned about the “immediate chaos” that could ensue at major terminals. The U.S. Travel Association reiterated that such a move could be “devastating” for cities that rely heavily on travel and tourism, stressing that passenger inconvenience could have broader economic implications.
A withdrawal of CBP Officers could result in processing delays for international travelers, potentially extending from 30 minutes to several hours. Airlines predict that the likelihood of missed connections would increase significantly, while airports may struggle to manage the flow of passengers. Such understaffing could lead to both operational and safety issues, including inefficient cargo handling.
The potential impacts are significant:
This situation presents a risk for travelers, especially during peak travel seasons like summer holidays or major international events, which could further escalate stress levels at airports.
Airports in sanctuary cities are pivotal to the local economy, with tourism supporting a host of related industries, including hotels, restaurants, and entertainment venues. A decline in passenger processing could have ripple effects:
With cities like San Francisco and New York generating billions from international visitors, the loss of CBP Officers could jeopardize millions in revenue and compromise jobs dependent on a vibrant tourism industry.
Airlines for America (A4A) have stated that the role of CBP Officers extends beyond passenger service to include critical support for international cargo flow. Efficient customs inspection is key for timely delivery of goods, including perishables and pharmaceuticals. A decrease in officer numbers could lead to delays in freight clearance and disrupt supply chains, increasing costs for companies reliant on on-time imports.
Major airlines, including Delta, United, and American Airlines, have communicated that staffing cuts at CBP would force them to reconsider flight routes and schedules, leading to broader impacts on operational timelines that would echo throughout the national economy.
As Secretary Mullin pushes for the retraction of CBP Officers from sanctuary cities, dissent is surfacing within the federal government. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has publicly expressed concern about the potential operational and economic impacts, suggesting the proposal could be detrimental. This internal divide underscores the complexity of balancing immigration enforcement and maintaining the integrity of the U.S. travel and trade systems.
As uncertainty looms, travelers preparing to fly into U.S. airports should consider the following tips:
While airlines are likely to provide updates about any changes in CBP staffing, travelers should remain alert and prepare for both delays and adjustments to their itineraries.
The discussions surrounding the withdrawal of CBP Officers not only reflect a significant intersection of immigration policy and local governance but also present serious implications for U.S. tourism. Ensuring a robust and effective presence of CBP Officers remains critical for the stability of the travel experience and the economic health of cities reliant on tourism.
Source: The post United States Travel and Airline Industries Sound Alarm Over Potential Withdrawal of CBP Officers from Major Liberal Airports Threatening Tourism and Flight Operations first appeared on www.travelandtourworld.com.
